[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee0629ce-1d25-ebac-e235-7a26149c2f46@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 16:45:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"kostap@...vell.com" <kostap@...vell.com>,
"robert.marko@...tura.hr" <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: marvell: Document the AC5/AC5X
compatibles
On 12/05/2022 03:51, Chris Packham wrote:
>>
>> I know the ap807 has something to do with the vagaries of the cn9130
>> SoC but isn't the "marvell,cn9130" still referring to the SoC. From
>> what you've said shouldn't there be a "marvell,cn9130-crb" somewhere
>> in the mix?
>>
>> Perhaps I've picked a bad example but the other dtbs I've poked at
>> don't have any board binding.
>>
> The fsl,imx boards seem like a better example to follow
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
Yes.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists