linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 24/26] dmaengine: dw-edma: Skip cleanup procedure if no private data found

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220512152354.GO35848@thinkpad>
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 20:53:54 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 24/26] dmaengine: dw-edma: Skip cleanup procedure if
 no private data found

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 01:51:02AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> DW eDMA driver private data is preserved in the passed DW eDMA chip info
> structure. If either probe procedure failed or for some reason the passed
> info object doesn't have private data pointer initialized we need to halt
> the DMA device cleanup procedure in order to prevent possible system
> crashes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>

As I said in the previous iteration, I'm not sure we will hit this issue.
But I don't object the patch. So,

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index 908607785401..561686b51915 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> @@ -1035,6 +1035,10 @@ int dw_edma_remove(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
>  	struct dw_edma *dw = chip->dw;
>  	int i;
>  
> +	/* Skip removal if no private data found */
> +	if (!dw)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	/* Disable eDMA */
>  	dw_edma_v0_core_off(dw);
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்