[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yn0wJba+u2C3LSw2@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 17:04:53 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Yong <jonathan.yong@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] platform/x86: introduce p2sb_bar() helper
On Thu, 12 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:00:38AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:08 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > On 5/10/22 17:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > I must admit I have lost track of all the Ack-s / Reviewed-by-s a bit.
> > > >
> > > > So from the above I take it that the Ack-s resp. Reviewed-by-s on the
> > > > other non drivers/platform/x86 bits also signal an Ack to merge the entire
> > > > series through the pdx86 tree?
> > > >
> > > > Lee, any chance you can take a look at patches 3-5 and give your Ack
> > > > for merging these through the pdx86 tree together with the rest?
> > >
> > > Actually I misinterpreted Lee's different tags again. Acked-by is
> > > normal for routing MFD code via other subsystems, while
> > > Acked-for-MFD-by is for Lee (scripts?) to route the code via MFD tree.
> > > Lee, is it the correct interpretation now?
> >
> > Yes, that is correct.
>
> Thanks for clarification. I'm learning hard way :-)
>
> > I just replied to your 0th patch (before I saw this, sorry).
>
> Thanks for the tag.
>
> So, it seems we all set to route this via MFD then. Do you think we can go?
> Or do need to postpone this to be after v5.19-rc1?
I think Hans is correct.
I would like to see this soak before submitting directly to Mainline.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists