[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220512160853.GB14475@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 18:08:53 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@...zu.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: VR41xx: Drop redundant spinlock initialization
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:55:27PM +0800, Haowen Bai wrote:
> slot_errbuf_lock has declared and initialized by DEFINE_SPINLOCK,
> so we don't need to spin_lock_init again, drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@...zu.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/vr41xx/common/cmu.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/cmu.c b/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/cmu.c
> index b59ee5479313..e4cbe116b26d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/cmu.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/cmu.c
> @@ -236,8 +236,6 @@ static int __init vr41xx_cmu_init(void)
> if (current_cpu_type() == CPU_VR4133)
> cmuclkmsk2 = cmu_read(CMUCLKMSK2);
>
> - spin_lock_init(&cmu_lock);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists