[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220512173921.8210-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:39:18 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/5] Documentation: gpio: Advertise irqd_to_hwirq() helper in the examples
Instead of direct dereferencing the IRQ data in order to get HW IRQ number
use the irqd_to_hwirq() helper.
Fixes: 5644b66a9c63 ("Documentation: Update the recommended pattern for GPIO irqchips")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
index 964d09118d17..70ff43ac4fcc 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:
static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -437,14 +438,15 @@ call into the core gpiolib code:
* state.
*/
- gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
}
static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
- gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);
/*
* Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt,
@@ -502,6 +504,7 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:
static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -509,14 +512,15 @@ the interrupt separately and go with it:
* state.
*/
- gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
}
static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
- gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);
/*
* Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt,
@@ -577,6 +581,7 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:
static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
/*
* Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt,
@@ -584,15 +589,16 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:
* state.
*/
- gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
irq_mask_mask_parent(d);
}
static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
- gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
+ gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);
/*
* Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt,
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists