linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] scripts/min-tool-version.sh: raise minimum clang version to 14.0.0 for s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yn1avbuIFdU87/Jj@osiris>
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 21:06:37 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jonas Paulsson <paulsson@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@...ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] scripts/min-tool-version.sh: raise minimum clang
 version to 14.0.0 for s390

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:56:27PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:27 PM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 5:05 AM Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Before version 14.0.0 llvm's integrated assembler fails to handle some
> > > displacement variants:
> > >
> > > arch/s390/purgatory/head.S:108:10: error: invalid operand for instruction
> > >  lg %r11,kernel_type-.base_crash(%r13)
> > >
> > > Instead of working around this and given that this is already fixed
> > > raise the minimum clang version from 13.0.0 to 14.0.0.
> >
> > Do you have the commit in LLVM that fixed this? Might be nice to link
> 
> Maybe it's
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D113341?

Yes, looks like it.

> Also, these are the open issues we had for the integrated assembler.
> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22%5BARCH%5D+s390%22+label%3A%22%5BTOOL%5D+integrated-as%22
> 
> Any chance you could include relevant Link tags on your commit
> messages for patches that address these? It makes it easier to track
> when/where things land if we ever intend to backport anything to
> stable.

Sure, will do.