[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO9JgFwA5ZhwOOY0cU3HpMOV69CTumQ50zEgU6SPNAF0zDbCGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:35:00 -0700
From: Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: Driver for Google Hangouts Meet Speakermic
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 3:53 AM Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2022, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > I am curious, could not this be achieved without a kernel driver by
> > simply using udev to map this usage code to KEY_RESERVED?
>
> Hmm, good point, using KEY_RESERVED mapping to achieve the key being
> actually ignored didn't immediately occur to me.
>
> Pablo, could you please verify that it behaves in the expected way, and
> confirm that we could drop the 'driver' in favor of udev rule?
I think I've achieved the same result by adding the following to udev
hwdb. Dmitry, is this what you had in mind, or is there a better way
of doing this?
evdev:input:b0003v18D1p8001*
KEYBOARD_KEY_b002f=reserved
Pablo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists