[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220512043310.v3e22423ybe4z65e@Rk>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:33:10 +0800
From: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@...e.com>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] kexec, KEYS: make the code in
bzImage64_verify_sig generic
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:52:09AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 05/12/22 at 10:46am, Baoquan He wrote:
>> On 05/12/22 at 10:34am, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> > commit 278311e417be ("kexec, KEYS: Make use of platform keyring for
>> > signature verify") adds platform keyring support on x86 kexec but not
>> > arm64.
>> >
>> > The code in bzImage64_verify_sig makes use of system keyrings including
>> > .buitin_trusted_keys, .secondary_trusted_keys and .platform keyring to
>> > verify signed kernel image as PE file. Make it generic so both x86_64
>> > and arm64 can use it.
>> >
>> > Note this patch is needed by a later patch so Cc it to the stable tree
>> > as well.
>>
>> This note should not be added in log.
>>
>> >
>> > Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org
>> > Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org
>> > Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
>> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
>
>Hold on, should we CC stable when it's not fixing an issue?
>
>Hi Coiby,
Hi Baoquan,
>
>Just to make clear , is this patch fixing an issue, or it's just an
>preparation for later patch's use?
>
>Or I should ask in another way, any problem is solved with this patch?
At least it doesn't fix an issue that satisfy the criteria listed in
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
>
>
>> > Reviewed-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
>> > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
>> > ---
>>
>> You can put the note here, it won't be added to commit log when merged.
>> Maybe it can be removed when merged.
Thanks for the suggestion! Shall I send a version to fix this problem or
can I just bother the maintainer to remove it?
>>
>> Otherwise, LGTM
>>
>> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
>>
>> > arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 20 +-------------------
>> > include/linux/kexec.h | 7 +++++++
>> > kernel/kexec_file.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
>> > index 170d0fd68b1f..f299b48f9c9f 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
>> > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> > #include <linux/mm.h>
>> > #include <linux/efi.h>
>> > -#include <linux/verification.h>
>> >
>> > #include <asm/bootparam.h>
>> > #include <asm/setup.h>
>> > @@ -528,28 +527,11 @@ static int bzImage64_cleanup(void *loader_data)
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> >
>> > -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_BZIMAGE_VERIFY_SIG
>> > -static int bzImage64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
>> > -{
>> > - int ret;
>> > -
>> > - ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
>> > - VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
>> > - VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
>> > - if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
>> > - ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
>> > - VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
>> > - VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
>> > - }
>> > - return ret;
>> > -}
>> > -#endif
>> > -
>> > const struct kexec_file_ops kexec_bzImage64_ops = {
>> > .probe = bzImage64_probe,
>> > .load = bzImage64_load,
>> > .cleanup = bzImage64_cleanup,
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_BZIMAGE_VERIFY_SIG
>> > - .verify_sig = bzImage64_verify_sig,
>> > + .verify_sig = kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig,
>> > #endif
>> > };
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> > index 413235c6c797..da83abfc628b 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> > #include <asm/io.h>
>> >
>> > #include <uapi/linux/kexec.h>
>> > +#include <linux/verification.h>
>> >
>> > /* Location of a reserved region to hold the crash kernel.
>> > */
>> > @@ -202,6 +203,12 @@ int arch_kexec_apply_relocations(struct purgatory_info *pi,
>> > const Elf_Shdr *relsec,
>> > const Elf_Shdr *symtab);
>> > int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION
>> > +int kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel,
>> > + unsigned long kernel_len);
>> > +#endif
>> > +#endif
>> > int arch_kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>> >
>> > extern int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>> > diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
>> > index 3720435807eb..754885b96aab 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
>> > @@ -165,6 +165,23 @@ void kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
>> > }
>> >
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION
>> > +int kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
>> > +{
>> > + int ret;
>> > +
>> > + ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
>> > + VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
>> > + VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
>> > + if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
>> > + ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
>> > + VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
>> > + VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
>> > + }
>> > + return ret;
>> > +}
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > static int kexec_image_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>> > unsigned long buf_len)
>> > {
>> > --
>> > 2.35.3
>> >
>>
>
--
Best regards,
Coiby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists