linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Fix counter restart during overflow for RV32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAhSdy3mbGdK9LrLxZX0JL0mQxP5FrFUuneX1cQS2SABpO=7dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 10:14:12 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To:     Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Fix counter restart during overflow for RV32

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 1:41 AM Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com> wrote:
>
> Pass the upper half of the initial value of the counter correctly
> for RV32.
>
> Fixes: 4905ec2fb7e6 ("RISC-V: Add sscofpmf extension support")
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index a1317a483512..24cea59612be 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu,
>                         max_period = riscv_pmu_ctr_get_width_mask(event);
>                         init_val = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count) & max_period;
>                         sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, idx, 1,
> -                                 flag, init_val, 0, 0);
> +                                 flag, init_val, init_val >> 32, 0);

This should be under "#if __riscv_xlen == 32".

>                 }
>                 ctr_ovf_mask = ctr_ovf_mask >> 1;
>                 idx++;
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Apart from above, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>

Regards,
Anup