[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ff41b86a7f7c7ce73cf800a7c1ecb531b835786.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 13:51:11 +0800
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
To: <yf.wang@...iatek.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@...tatee.com>,
"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>, Libo Kang <Libo.Kang@...iatek.com>,
Ning Li <Ning.Li@...iatek.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Fix iova map result check bug
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 16:52 +0800, yf.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@...iatek.com>
>
> The data type of the return value of the iommu_map_sg_atomic
> is ssize_t, but the data type of iova size is size_t,
> e.g. one is int while the other is unsigned int.
>
> When iommu_map_sg_atomic return value is compared with iova size,
> it will force the signed int to be converted to unsigned int, if
> iova map fails and iommu_map_sg_atomic return error code is less
> than 0, then (ret < iova_len) is false, which will to cause not
> do free iova, and the master can still successfully get the iova
> of map fail, which is not expected.
>
> Therefore, we need to check the return value of iommu_map_sg_atomic
> in two cases according to whether it is less than 0.
>
> Fixes: ad8f36e4b6b1 ("iommu: return full error code from
> iommu_map_sg[_atomic]()")
> Signed-off-by: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@...iatek.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.15.*
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 09f6e1c0f9c0..2932281e93fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ static struct page
> **__iommu_dma_alloc_noncontiguous(struct device *dev,
> unsigned int count, min_size, alloc_sizes = domain-
> >pgsize_bitmap;
> struct page **pages;
> dma_addr_t iova;
> + ssize_t ret;
>
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&iommu_deferred_attach_enabled) &&
> iommu_deferred_attach(dev, domain))
> @@ -813,8 +814,8 @@ static struct page
> **__iommu_dma_alloc_noncontiguous(struct device *dev,
> arch_dma_prep_coherent(sg_page(sg), sg-
> >length);
> }
>
> - if (iommu_map_sg_atomic(domain, iova, sgt->sgl, sgt-
> >orig_nents, ioprot)
> - < size)
> + ret = iommu_map_sg_atomic(domain, iova, sgt->sgl, sgt-
> >orig_nents, ioprot);
> + if (ret < 0 || ret < size)
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret) || ret < size) for readable?
> goto out_free_sg;
>
> sgt->sgl->dma_address = iova;
> @@ -1209,7 +1210,7 @@ static int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev,
> struct scatterlist *sg,
> * implementation - it knows better than we do.
> */
> ret = iommu_map_sg_atomic(domain, iova, sg, nents, prot);
> - if (ret < iova_len)
> + if (ret < 0 || ret < iova_len)
> goto out_free_iova;
>
> return __finalise_sg(dev, sg, nents, iova);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists