linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 10/23] ata: libahci_platform: Parse ports-implemented property in resources getter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1e349868-b302-1473-188a-1a6f2bb88cd5@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 08:48:24 +0200
From:   Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/23] ata: libahci_platform: Parse ports-implemented
 property in resources getter

On 5/12/22 01:17, Serge Semin wrote:
> The ports-implemented property is mainly used on the OF-based platforms
> with no ports mapping initialized by a bootloader/BIOS firmware. Seeing
> the same of_property_read_u32()-based pattern has already been implemented
> in the generic AHCI LLDD (glue) driver and in the Mediatek, St AHCI
> drivers let's move the property read procedure to the generic
> ahci_platform_get_resources() method. Thus we'll have the forced ports
> mapping feature supported for each OF-based platform which requires that,
> and stop re-implementing the same pattern in there a bit simplifying the
> code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> ---
>   drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c         | 2 --
>   drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c    | 3 ---
>   drivers/ata/ahci_st.c          | 3 ---
>   drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 3 +++
>   4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
> index 1f6c85fde983..c056378e3e72 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
> @@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ static int mtk_ahci_parse_property(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv,
>   				   SYS_CFG_SATA_EN);
>   	}
>   
> -	of_property_read_u32(np, "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
> -
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> index 28a8de5b48b9..9b56490ecbc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> @@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (rc)
>   		return rc;
>   
> -	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> -			     "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
> -
>   	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "hisilicon,hisi-ahci"))
>   		hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS | AHCI_HFLAG_NO_NCQ;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
> index 7526653c843b..068621099c00 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
> @@ -168,9 +168,6 @@ static int st_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	st_ahci_configure_oob(hpriv->mmio);
>   
> -	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> -			     "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
> -
>   	err = ahci_platform_init_host(pdev, hpriv, &st_ahci_port_info,
>   				      &ahci_platform_sht);
>   	if (err) {
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> index 4e54e19f07b2..f7f9cac10cb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> @@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   		goto err_out;
>   	}
>   
> +	of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> +			     "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
> +
>   	if (child_nodes) {
>   		for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
>   			u32 port;

What happens on the other platforms?
Won't they register an error if that property isn't implemented?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer