[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220512072809.aztba67eummh2amf@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 12:58:09 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: Split cpufreq_offline()
On 11-05-22, 17:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Split the "core" part running under the policy rwsem out of
> cpufreq_offline() to allow the locking in cpufreq_remove_dev() to be
> rearranged more easily.
>
> As a side-effect this eliminates the unlock label that's not needed
> any more.
>
> No expected functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists