lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 10:27:17 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     "Martinez, Ricardo" <ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com, linuxwwan@...el.com,
        chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com, haijun.liu@...iatek.com,
        m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
        ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, johannes@...solutions.net,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix return type of
 t7xx_dl_add_timedout()

On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 17:35 -0700, Martinez, Ricardo wrote:
> On 5/11/2022 12:19 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> > t7xx_dl_add_timedout() now return int 'ret', but the return type
> > is bool. Change the return type to int for furthor errcode upstream.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c
> > index c8bf6929af51..8ee15af1a1ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_dpmaif.c
> > @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ unsigned int t7xx_dpmaif_dl_dlq_pit_get_wr_idx(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info,
> >   	return value & DPMAIF_DL_RD_WR_IDX_MSK;
> >   }
> >   
> > -static bool t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info)
> > +static int t7xx_dl_add_timedout(struct dpmaif_hw_info *hw_info)
> yes, int is the right return type, thanks!
> 

Changing the return type without using the different error code in the
caller is quite useless. Additionally t7xx_dl_add_timedout() (via
ioread32_poll_timeout_atomic()) can produce a single error value
(ETIMEOUT). IMHO this change is not needed.

You may want to remove the 'ret' local variable instead (in the same
function)

Cheers,

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ