lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 10:58:36 +0200
From:   Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
        Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] watchdog: simatic-ipc-wdt: convert to use P2SB
 accessor

Am Wed, 11 May 2022 11:03:04 -0700
schrieb Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>:

> On 5/11/22 08:39, Henning Schild wrote:
> > Since we have a common P2SB accessor in tree we may use it instead
> > of open coded variants.
> > 
> > Replace custom code by p2sb_bar() call.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/watchdog/Kconfig           |  1 +
> >   drivers/watchdog/simatic-ipc-wdt.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> >   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > index c4e82a8d863f..643a8f5a97b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > @@ -1628,6 +1628,7 @@ config SIEMENS_SIMATIC_IPC_WDT
> >   	tristate "Siemens Simatic IPC Watchdog"
> >   	depends on SIEMENS_SIMATIC_IPC
> >   	select WATCHDOG_CORE
> > +	select P2SB if X86  
> 
> Why "if X86" ? SIEMENS_SIMATIC_IPC already depends on it.

Thanks, will remove that.

> Also, I just noticed that P2SB is neither in mainline nor
> in linux-next, meaning this code won't even compile right now.
> That should be mentioned in the introduction e-mail (the use
> of "introduced" suggests that it is already there; you could
> just use "will be introduced" instead).

It was kind of in the cover letter, but maybe not verbose enough. Sorry
for the confusion. v1 was sent in-reply-to on top of P2SB, maybe i will
do that again for v3 but for sure point out the order in case i send it
without the reply.

Thanks,
Henning

> Thanks,
> Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ