[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e23160b6-2d3c-ebdb-ac5a-c71311e7e5ec@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 11:08:02 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
thuth@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, wintera@...ux.ibm.com, seiden@...ux.ibm.com,
nrb@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] s390x: KVM: ipte lock for SCA access should be
contained in KVM
On 06.05.22 11:24, Pierre Morel wrote:
> The former check to chose between SIIF or not SIIF can be done
> using the sclp.has_siif instead of accessing per vCPU structures
>
> When accessing the SCA, ipte lock and ipte_unlock do not need
> to access any vcpu structures but only the KVM structure.
>
> Let's simplify the ipte handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Much better
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists