lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v8ub6jk1.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 22:07:26 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        fnovak@...ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
        christophe.leroy@...roup.eu
Subject: Re: request_module DoS

Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:
> Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> writes:
...
>
>> Can someone try this on ppc64le system? At this point I am not convinced
>> this issue is generic.
>
> Does your x86 system have at least 784 CPUs?
>
> I don't know where the original report came from, but the trace shows
> "CPU 784", which would usually indicate a system with at least that many
> CPUs.

Update, apparently the report originally came from IBM, so I'll chase it
up internally.

I think you're right that there's probably no issue in the module code,
sorry to waste your time.

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ