[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUahv8WVMXWXseCN8hC0qJL4fKBhA+eR9hnydgK-WDHQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:05:13 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
Sohaib Mohamed <sohaib.amhmd@...il.com>,
Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@....com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] perf test: Use skip in vmlinux kallsyms
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:01 AM John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 13/05/2022 05:05, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Currently failures in reading vmlinux or kallsyms result in a test
> > failure. However, the failure is typically permission related.
>
> If the user requires root priviledges then should we just mention this
> would be a problem for this test?
Tbh, it wasn't clear to me and so I didn't add a reason for skipping.
Thanks,
Ian
> > Prefer to
> > flag these failures as skip.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers<irogers@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks,
> John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists