[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220513171811.730-3-mkoutny@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 19:18:09 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: void@...ifault.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, kernel-team@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, mkoutny@...e.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeelb@...gle.com, tj@...nel.org,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] selftests: memcg: Expect no low events in unprotected sibling
This is effectively a revert of commit cdc69458a5f3 ("cgroup: account
for memory_recursiveprot in test_memcg_low()"). The case test_memcg_low
will fail with memory_recursiveprot until resolved in reclaim
code.
However, this patch preserves the existing helpers and variables for
later uses.
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
index 4958b42201a9..eba252fa64ac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static int test_memcg_low(const char *root)
}
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(children); i++) {
- int no_low_events_index = has_recursiveprot ? 2 : 1;
+ int no_low_events_index = 1;
oom = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "oom ");
low = cg_read_key_long(children[i], "memory.events", "low ");
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists