linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220513135333.7424c1c8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 13:53:33 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>, Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h

between commit:

  75189d1de1b3 ("KVM: x86/pmu: Update AMD PMC sample period to fix guest NMI-watchdog")

from Linus' tree and commits:

  a10cabf6815c ("KVM: x86/pmu: Move pmc_speculative_in_use() to arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h")
  8eeac7e999e8 ("KVM: x86/pmu: Add kvm_pmu_cap to optimize perf_get_x86_pmu_capability")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 22992b049d38,dbf4c83519a4..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@@ -138,15 -143,35 +143,44 @@@ static inline u64 get_sample_period(str
  	return sample_period;
  }
  
 +static inline void pmc_update_sample_period(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 +{
 +	if (!pmc->perf_event || pmc->is_paused)
 +		return;
 +
 +	perf_event_period(pmc->perf_event,
 +			  get_sample_period(pmc, pmc->counter));
 +}
 +
+ static inline bool pmc_speculative_in_use(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
+ {
+ 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
+ 
+ 	if (pmc_is_fixed(pmc))
+ 		return fixed_ctrl_field(pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl,
+ 					pmc->idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED) & 0x3;
+ 
+ 	return pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
+ }
+ 
+ extern struct x86_pmu_capability kvm_pmu_cap;
+ 
+ static inline void kvm_init_pmu_capability(void)
+ {
+ 	perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(&kvm_pmu_cap);
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * Only support guest architectural pmu on
+ 	 * a host with architectural pmu.
+ 	 */
+ 	if (!kvm_pmu_cap.version)
+ 		memset(&kvm_pmu_cap, 0, sizeof(kvm_pmu_cap));
+ 
+ 	kvm_pmu_cap.version = min(kvm_pmu_cap.version, 2);
+ 	kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed = min(kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed,
+ 					     KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED);
+ }
+ 
  void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel);
  void reprogram_fixed_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u8 ctrl, int fixed_idx);
  void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped