[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220513161910.d1b73583cdb2e33562aa86e5@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:19:10 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+acf65ca584991f3cc447@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
trix@...hat.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in follow_hugetlb_page
On Fri, 13 May 2022 15:48:15 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 5/13/22 11:09, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > On 5/13/22 10:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Fri, 13 May 2022 09:43:24 -0700 syzbot <syzbot+acf65ca584991f3cc447@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>> HEAD commit: 1e1b28b936ae Add linux-next specific files for 20220513
> >>> git tree: linux-next
> >>> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=174ae715f00000
> >>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e4eb3c0c4b289571
> >>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=acf65ca584991f3cc447
> >>> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> >>> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=11531766f00000
> >>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16ce5a9ef00000
> >>>
> >>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> >>> Reported-by: syzbot+acf65ca584991f3cc447@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> >>>
> >>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3611 at mm/hugetlb.c:6250 follow_hugetlb_page+0x1326/0x1c80 mm/hugetlb.c:6250
> >>
> >> The try_grab_folio() added by 822951d84684d ("mm/hugetlb: Use
> >> try_grab_folio() instead of try_grab_compound_head()"). That commit
> >> has been there over a month so I guess it's something else. Does
> >> someone have the time to bisect?
> >
> > I can recreate in my 'easy to debug' environment, so I can bisect in
> > parallel with other things I need to do today.
> >
>
> I isolated this to Minchan Kim's "mm: fix is_pinnable_page against on cma
> page". Yes, the fat finger fix is in next-20220513.
>
> I don't have time to analyze right now, but can confirm that in the
> reproducer is_pinnable_page is returning false after this change when it
> previously returned true.
OK, thanks, I dropped mm-fix-is_pinnable_page-against-on-cma-page.patch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists