[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220513091734.hivkkbpc6inyb4la@SoMainline.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 11:17:34 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: Add pm6125
compatible
On 2022-05-13 10:19:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/05/2022 00:06, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > The pm6125 comes with 9 GPIOs, without holes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>
> It's the first version, how did the tag appear here?
We are friends and review each-others patches offline before spamming
the mailing list with them, to save readers and maintainers here from
pointing out glaring mistakes. I hope this is standard practice in
companies too, or do you recommend aganst us doing this?
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
>
> This will need fixups or rebasing on my sets of PMIC gpio schema cleanup:
Ack.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220507194913.261121-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220508135932.132378-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>
> Bjorn,
> let us know preferred order (who should rebase on who).
I prefer yours to be applied first, so that I can retest this
patchseries with stricter / more correct dt-bindings introduced by it.
My series can also be resent with the notice that it has already been
rebased on top of your series, after collecting more reviews. Where
necessary, I can review your series too if that helps getting it in
sooner.
- Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists