[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51a9cc50-72ab-2417-1a22-0d85a944d00b@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 11:33:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add PM6125 PMIC
On 13/05/2022 11:25, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> No children, so this should not be needed, I think.
>
> The size-cells or the entire node? There's a PWM/LPG block here
> according to downstream DT, but my device doesn't use it so I can't test
> that it is valid. I can add it anyway, presuming reviewers here have
> the ability to validate it for me with a reference manual.
I mean only the address/size cells. They are needed for the children,
unless some binding expects it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists