linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add PM6125 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 11:33:21 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add PM6125 PMIC

On 13/05/2022 11:25, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>>> +		#size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> No children, so this should not be needed, I think.
> 
> The size-cells or the entire node?  There's a PWM/LPG block here
> according to downstream DT, but my device doesn't use it so I can't test
> that it is valid.  I can add it anyway, presuming reviewers here have
> the ability to validate it for me with a reference manual.


I mean only the address/size cells. They are needed for the children,
unless some binding expects it?


Best regards,
Krzysztof