linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/18] EDAC/amd64: Remove PCI Function 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yn4rOD9CS9LFxzhx@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 11:56:08 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com, muralidhara.mk@....com,
        naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] EDAC/amd64: Remove PCI Function 0

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:34:29PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> Also, there are five function pointers that are created in this patchset and
> called from hw_info_get(). I think those pointers can be dropped and the
> helper functions called from hw_info_get(). So I think it'd be good to make
> hw_info_get() into a function pointer which gets set to a functoin that calls
> the right collection of legacy, modern, and GPU helper functions. How does
> that sound?

Makes sense.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette