| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202205131842.j3oh7PXI-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 18:42:56 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: send cdc msg inline if qp has
sufficient inline space
Hi Guangguan,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Guangguan-Wang/net-smc-send-and-write-inline-optimization-for-smc/20220513-151715
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git b67fd3d9d94223b424674f45eeadeff58b4b03ef
config: nios2-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220513/202205131842.j3oh7PXI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/bac726bf950dac20959af52c6884b7bb07772dac
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Guangguan-Wang/net-smc-send-and-write-inline-optimization-for-smc/20220513-151715
git checkout bac726bf950dac20959af52c6884b7bb07772dac
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.3.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=nios2 SHELL=/bin/bash net/smc/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/smc/smc_wr.c: In function 'smc_wr_init_sge':
>> net/smc/smc_wr.c:561:57: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
561 | lnk->wr_tx_sges[i].addr = send_inline ? (u64)(&lnk->wr_tx_bufs[i]) :
| ^
vim +561 net/smc/smc_wr.c
553
554 static void smc_wr_init_sge(struct smc_link *lnk)
555 {
556 int sges_per_buf = (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) ? 2 : 1;
557 bool send_inline = (lnk->qp_attr.cap.max_inline_data >= SMC_WR_TX_SIZE);
558 u32 i;
559
560 for (i = 0; i < lnk->wr_tx_cnt; i++) {
> 561 lnk->wr_tx_sges[i].addr = send_inline ? (u64)(&lnk->wr_tx_bufs[i]) :
562 lnk->wr_tx_dma_addr + i * SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE;
563 lnk->wr_tx_sges[i].length = SMC_WR_TX_SIZE;
564 lnk->wr_tx_sges[i].lkey = lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
565 lnk->wr_tx_rdma_sges[i].tx_rdma_sge[0].wr_tx_rdma_sge[0].lkey =
566 lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
567 lnk->wr_tx_rdma_sges[i].tx_rdma_sge[0].wr_tx_rdma_sge[1].lkey =
568 lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
569 lnk->wr_tx_rdma_sges[i].tx_rdma_sge[1].wr_tx_rdma_sge[0].lkey =
570 lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
571 lnk->wr_tx_rdma_sges[i].tx_rdma_sge[1].wr_tx_rdma_sge[1].lkey =
572 lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
573 lnk->wr_tx_ibs[i].next = NULL;
574 lnk->wr_tx_ibs[i].sg_list = &lnk->wr_tx_sges[i];
575 lnk->wr_tx_ibs[i].num_sge = 1;
576 lnk->wr_tx_ibs[i].opcode = IB_WR_SEND;
577 lnk->wr_tx_ibs[i].send_flags =
578 IB_SEND_SIGNALED | IB_SEND_SOLICITED;
579 if (send_inline)
580 lnk->wr_tx_ibs[i].send_flags |= IB_SEND_INLINE;
581 lnk->wr_tx_rdmas[i].wr_tx_rdma[0].wr.opcode = IB_WR_RDMA_WRITE;
582 lnk->wr_tx_rdmas[i].wr_tx_rdma[1].wr.opcode = IB_WR_RDMA_WRITE;
583 lnk->wr_tx_rdmas[i].wr_tx_rdma[0].wr.sg_list =
584 lnk->wr_tx_rdma_sges[i].tx_rdma_sge[0].wr_tx_rdma_sge;
585 lnk->wr_tx_rdmas[i].wr_tx_rdma[1].wr.sg_list =
586 lnk->wr_tx_rdma_sges[i].tx_rdma_sge[1].wr_tx_rdma_sge;
587 }
588
589 if (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
590 lnk->wr_tx_v2_sge->addr = lnk->wr_tx_v2_dma_addr;
591 lnk->wr_tx_v2_sge->length = SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE;
592 lnk->wr_tx_v2_sge->lkey = lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
593
594 lnk->wr_tx_v2_ib->next = NULL;
595 lnk->wr_tx_v2_ib->sg_list = lnk->wr_tx_v2_sge;
596 lnk->wr_tx_v2_ib->num_sge = 1;
597 lnk->wr_tx_v2_ib->opcode = IB_WR_SEND;
598 lnk->wr_tx_v2_ib->send_flags =
599 IB_SEND_SIGNALED | IB_SEND_SOLICITED;
600 }
601
602 /* With SMC-Rv2 there can be messages larger than SMC_WR_TX_SIZE.
603 * Each ib_recv_wr gets 2 sges, the second one is a spillover buffer
604 * and the same buffer for all sges. When a larger message arrived then
605 * the content of the first small sge is copied to the beginning of
606 * the larger spillover buffer, allowing easy data mapping.
607 */
608 for (i = 0; i < lnk->wr_rx_cnt; i++) {
609 int x = i * sges_per_buf;
610
611 lnk->wr_rx_sges[x].addr =
612 lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr + i * SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE;
613 lnk->wr_rx_sges[x].length = SMC_WR_TX_SIZE;
614 lnk->wr_rx_sges[x].lkey = lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
615 if (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
616 lnk->wr_rx_sges[x + 1].addr =
617 lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr + SMC_WR_TX_SIZE;
618 lnk->wr_rx_sges[x + 1].length =
619 SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE - SMC_WR_TX_SIZE;
620 lnk->wr_rx_sges[x + 1].lkey =
621 lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
622 }
623 lnk->wr_rx_ibs[i].next = NULL;
624 lnk->wr_rx_ibs[i].sg_list = &lnk->wr_rx_sges[x];
625 lnk->wr_rx_ibs[i].num_sge = sges_per_buf;
626 }
627 lnk->wr_reg.wr.next = NULL;
628 lnk->wr_reg.wr.num_sge = 0;
629 lnk->wr_reg.wr.send_flags = IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
630 lnk->wr_reg.wr.opcode = IB_WR_REG_MR;
631 lnk->wr_reg.access = IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE;
632 }
633
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists