[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yn5Ts1+56rBip8Mc@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 13:48:51 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Extend deferred probe timeout on driver
registration
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> The deferred probe timer that's used for this currently starts at
> late_initcall and runs for driver_deferred_probe_timeout seconds. The
> assumption being that all available drivers would be loaded and
> registered before the timer expires. This means, the
> driver_deferred_probe_timeout has to be pretty large for it to cover the
> worst case. But if we set the default value for it to cover the worst
> case, it would significantly slow down the average case. For this
> reason, the default value is set to 0.
This makes sense to me.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists