linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: skb: check the boundrary of drop reason in kfree_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADxym3auygXR_p5xW1F81wX04SwKHAPPHiu_P94gT-w5vdi9Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 10:41:08 +0800
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, Talal Ahmad <talalahmad@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, asml.silence@...il.com,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        vasily.averin@...ux.dev,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: skb: check the boundrary of drop
 reason in kfree_skb_reason()

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:16 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2022 20:33:11 +0800 menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> > +     if (unlikely(reason <= 0 || reason >= SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX)) {
> > +             DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > +             reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
> > +     }
>
> With drop_monitor fixes sending an invalid reason to the tracepoint
> should be a minor bug, right?
>
> Can we just have a:
>
>         DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(reason <= 0 || reason >= SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX);
>
> and avoid having this branch on non-debug builds?

Yeah, it seems this way is more logical. I'll change it in the V3.