[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a54012e3-291b-42e8-752a-9abc9a88ad6c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 03:30:49 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, Zhigang.Shi@...eon.com,
krisman@...labora.com
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
alvaro.soliverez@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] iio: light: Add support for ltrf216a sensor
11.05.2022 12:40, Shreeya Patel пишет:
> +static int ltrf216a_set_int_time(struct ltrf216a_data *data, int itime)
> +{
> + int i, ret, index = -1;
> + u8 reg_val;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ltrf216a_int_time_available); i++) {
> + if (ltrf216a_int_time_available[i][1] == itime) {
> + index = i;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (index < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + reg_val = ltrf216a_int_time_reg[index][1];
> + data->int_time_fac = ltrf216a_int_time_reg[index][0];
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, LTRF216A_ALS_MEAS_RES, reg_val);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
Should the data->int_time_fac be updated only if I2C write was successful?
I'm not sure what reading of LTRF216A_CLEAR_DATA reg does, but if it
clears the measured data, then shouldn't the data be cleared after
changing the config?
> + data->int_time = itime;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists