linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.17 03/12] udf: Avoid using stale lengthOfImpUse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220513142228.753578790@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 16:24:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@...il.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 03/12] udf: Avoid using stale lengthOfImpUse

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit c1ad35dd0548ce947d97aaf92f7f2f9a202951cf upstream.

udf_write_fi() uses lengthOfImpUse of the entry it is writing to.
However this field has not yet been initialized so it either contains
completely bogus value or value from last directory entry at that place.
In either case this is wrong and can lead to filesystem corruption or
kernel crashes.

Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@...il.com>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 979a6e28dd96 ("udf: Get rid of 0-length arrays in struct fileIdentDesc")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/udf/namei.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/udf/namei.c
+++ b/fs/udf/namei.c
@@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ int udf_write_fi(struct inode *inode, st
 
 	if (fileident) {
 		if (adinicb || (offset + lfi < 0)) {
-			memcpy(udf_get_fi_ident(sfi), fileident, lfi);
+			memcpy(sfi->impUse + liu, fileident, lfi);
 		} else if (offset >= 0) {
 			memcpy(fibh->ebh->b_data + offset, fileident, lfi);
 		} else {
-			memcpy(udf_get_fi_ident(sfi), fileident, -offset);
+			memcpy(sfi->impUse + liu, fileident, -offset);
 			memcpy(fibh->ebh->b_data, fileident - offset,
 				lfi + offset);
 		}
@@ -88,11 +88,11 @@ int udf_write_fi(struct inode *inode, st
 	offset += lfi;
 
 	if (adinicb || (offset + padlen < 0)) {
-		memset(udf_get_fi_ident(sfi) + lfi, 0x00, padlen);
+		memset(sfi->impUse + liu + lfi, 0x00, padlen);
 	} else if (offset >= 0) {
 		memset(fibh->ebh->b_data + offset, 0x00, padlen);
 	} else {
-		memset(udf_get_fi_ident(sfi) + lfi, 0x00, -offset);
+		memset(sfi->impUse + liu + lfi, 0x00, -offset);
 		memset(fibh->ebh->b_data, 0x00, padlen + offset);
 	}