[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yn566YlpyD1UnbY0@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 08:36:09 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] kunit: Taint the kernel when KUnit tests are run
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:32:12PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> Make KUnit trigger the new TAINT_TEST taint when any KUnit test is run.
> Due to KUnit tests not being intended to run on production systems, and
> potentially causing problems (or security issues like leaking kernel
> addresses), the kernel's state should not be considered safe for
> production use after KUnit tests are run.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists