linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: Wire Oxford Semiconductor PCIe (Tornado) 950

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2205141454350.10656@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date:   Sat, 14 May 2022 14:58:08 +0100 (BST)
From:   "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Documentation: Wire Oxford Semiconductor PCIe
 (Tornado) 950

On Sat, 14 May 2022, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:

> > Shouldn't this patch be squashed into [1/2]?
> > 
> 
> Oops, I mean patch [1/3].

 Possibly, but I chose to keep one self-contained change per patch as per 
the cover letter and also concluded it makes no sense to wire the document 
while it's still broken.  I'm leaving it up to the maintainers to decide 
and I will repost an updated change if required.

  Maciej