lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 00:51:42 +0800 From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com> To: <wenst@...omium.org> CC: <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>, <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] clk: mediatek: mt27xx: Replace 'struct clk' with 'struct clk_hw' Hi ChenYu, > As mentioned in the cover letter, the patch is split between the manually > edited parts and the coccinelle converted parts. This should help with > review, especially trying to identify which part of the coccinelle scripts > failed. The split also reduces the size of each patch so that they don't > get blocked. > > I opted not to add additional APIs, as we would just be removing them at > the end, and that just results in even more code churn. > > > ChenYu ok, I re-read the cover letter, I will ignore the bisect part and do review and test. thanks, Miles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists