linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] clk: mediatek: mt27xx: Replace 'struct clk' with 'struct clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 15 May 2022 00:51:42 +0800
From:   Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     <wenst@...omium.org>
CC:     <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] clk: mediatek: mt27xx: Replace 'struct clk' with 'struct clk_hw'

Hi ChenYu,

> As mentioned in the cover letter, the patch is split between the manually
> edited parts and the coccinelle converted parts. This should help with
> review, especially trying to identify which part of the coccinelle scripts
> failed. The split also reduces the size of each patch so that they don't
> get blocked.
> 
> I opted not to add additional APIs, as we would just be removing them at
> the end, and that just results in even more code churn.
> 
> 
> ChenYu

ok, I re-read the cover letter, I will ignore the bisect part and do review
and test.

thanks,
Miles