[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220514165142.20607-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 00:51:42 +0800
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To: <wenst@...omium.org>
CC: <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<miles.chen@...iatek.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] clk: mediatek: mt27xx: Replace 'struct clk' with 'struct clk_hw'
Hi ChenYu,
> As mentioned in the cover letter, the patch is split between the manually
> edited parts and the coccinelle converted parts. This should help with
> review, especially trying to identify which part of the coccinelle scripts
> failed. The split also reduces the size of each patch so that they don't
> get blocked.
>
> I opted not to add additional APIs, as we would just be removing them at
> the end, and that just results in even more code churn.
>
>
> ChenYu
ok, I re-read the cover letter, I will ignore the bisect part and do review
and test.
thanks,
Miles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists