linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: mediatek: Move to struct clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 15 May 2022 01:11:13 +0800
From:   Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC:     <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <wenst@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: mediatek: Move to struct clk_hw provider APIs

> Hi everyone,
> 
> This is v2 of part 2 of my proposed MediaTek clk driver cleanup work [1].
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Rebased and added coverage of new MT8186 clk drivers
> - Split patch "clk: mediatek: Replace 'struct clk' with 'struct clk_hw'"
>    into arbitrary pieces so that they don't bounce from the mailing lists
> 
> This was tested on MT8183 Juniper. Apppreciate any help testing on non-
> ChromeOS devices.
>

> For the entire series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> 
> ...and this entire series was tested on:
> MT8173/92/95 and MT6795 (Sony Xperia M5 smartphone, clock drivers not sent
> upstream yet), so you also get my:
> 
> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>

Tested on: MT6779

Tested-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com> 

> 
> ...and last, but not least:
> 
> Thank you! :-)