[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220515030416.GA5866@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 11:06:49 +0800
From: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [x86/uaccess] 9c5743dff4:
WARNING:at_arch/x86/mm/extable.c:#ex_handler_fprestore
Hi Boris,
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:12:38PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 09:52:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 1:55 AM kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-11): commit
> > > 9c5743dff415 ("x86/uaccess: fix code generation in put_user()")
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> Err, is this seriously a report for a 5.9-something kernel?
yeah, after some update such like test suite, kconfig, it's possible for us to
tigger some bisection again which finally points to old commit.
>
> [ 266.828722][ T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.9.0-13419-g9c5743dff415 #1
>
> > >
> > > in testcase: boot
> > >
> > > on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G
> > >
> > > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
>
> Can you reproduce the same with the latest Linus master or tip/master or
> something current...?
sorry about this, "WARNING:at_arch/x86/mm/extable.c:#ex_handler_fprestore"
cannot be reproduced on v5.18-rc6.
the problem is our bot actually picks
"dmesg.Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Attempted_to_kill_init!exitcode="
to do the bisection, unfortunately, this is still existing on v5.18-rc6 [1],
which confused our bot to regard this as a valid report.
(while generating final reports, bot tried to pick specific warning from dmesg)
we will investigate to avoid this kind of problem.
3cb12d27ff655e57 9c5743dff415a7384669229d327
---------------- ---------------------------
fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
| | |
:50 82% 41:52 dmesg.Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Attempted_to_kill_init!exitcode= <--- still in v5.18-rc6
:50 82% 41:52 dmesg.RIP:copy_kernel_to_fpregs
:50 82% 41:52 dmesg.RIP:ex_handler_fprestore
:50 82% 41:52 dmesg.WARNING:at_arch/x86/mm/extable.c:#ex_handler_fprestore <--- not in v5.18-rc6
[1]
[ 255.392247][ T1] init: Failed to spawn kernel-tests main process: unable to execute: Bad address
[ 255.451755][ T1] init[1] bad frame in rt_sigreturn frame:00007ffeaf881638 ip:7fbde926f700 sp:7ffeaf881bf8 orax:ffffffffffffffff in libc-2.15.so[7fbde9
239000+1b3000]
[ 255.563440][ T223] init (223) used greatest stack depth: 11904 bytes left
[ 255.566005][ T1] init[1] bad frame in rt_sigreturn frame:00007ffeaf880ef8 ip:7fbde92f6c3e sp:7ffeaf8814c0 orax:ffffffffffffffff in libc-2.15.so[7fbde9
239000+1b3000]
[ 255.573639][ T1] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b
[ 255.575676][ T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6 #1
[ 255.577359][ T1] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
[ 255.579574][ T1] Call Trace:
[ 255.580392][ T1] <TASK>
[ 255.581213][ T1] ? __dump_stack+0x6e/0x9d
[ 255.582373][ T1] ? dump_stack+0x37/0x64
[ 255.583666][ T1] ? panic+0x575/0xc88
[ 255.584657][ T1] ? rcuwait_wake_up+0x264/0x3d0
[ 255.586047][ T1] ? do_exit.cold+0x54/0x124
[ 255.587132][ T1] ? do_group_exit+0x89/0x2d0
[ 255.588365][ T1] ? get_signal+0x1cdc/0x1ce0
[ 255.589512][ T1] ? arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x28/0x150
[ 255.591205][ T1] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x834/0x8c0
[ 255.592565][ T1] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x50
[ 255.594023][ T1] ? do_syscall_64+0x70/0x90
[ 255.595318][ T1] ? file_end_write+0x46/0x490
[ 255.596623][ T1] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xdf/0x1d0
[ 255.598142][ T1] ? tracer_hardirqs_on+0x1bb/0x1d0
[ 255.599418][ T1] ? static_key_count+0x77/0x80
[ 255.600884][ T1] ? do_syscall_64+0x11/0x90
[ 255.601994][ T1] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 255.603462][ T1] </TASK>
[ 255.604508][ T1] Kernel Offset: disabled
>
> Thx.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists