[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220516180628.GL1343366@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 15:06:28 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ning Sun <ning.sun@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] x86/boot/tboot: Move tboot_force_iommu() to Intel
IOMMU
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 09:43:21AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> tboot_force_iommu() is only called by the Intel IOMMU driver. Move the
> helper into that driver. No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/tboot.h | 2 --
> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 15 ---------------
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> +static __init int tboot_force_iommu(void)
> +{
> + if (!tboot_enabled())
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (no_iommu || dmar_disabled)
> + pr_warn("Forcing Intel-IOMMU to enabled\n");
Unrelated, but when we are in the special secure IOMMU modes, do we
force ATS off? Specifically does the IOMMU reject TLPs that are marked
as translated?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists