[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220516181440.GA2997786-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 13:14:40 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:41:26AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 05:28:14PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 May 2022 09:06:20 +1200 Chris Packham wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema
> >
> > JSON or YAML?
I actually prefer 'DT schema format' which implicitly means json-schema
vocabulary in YAML formatted files (among other constraints we place on
them).
>
> JAML is a superset of JSON. So it is not completely wrong. I've no
> idea if this particular binding sticks to the subset which is JSON.
I think you just invented a new term for 'JSON compatible YAML subset'.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists