[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220516193619.887269240@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 21:36:16 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Aloni <dan.aloni@...tdata.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 16/66] nfs: fix broken handling of the softreval mount option
From: Dan Aloni <dan.aloni@...tdata.com>
[ Upstream commit 085d16d5f949b64713d5e960d6c9bbf51bc1d511 ]
Turns out that ever since this mount option was added, passing
`softreval` in NFS mount options cancelled all other flags while not
affecting the underlying flag `NFS_MOUNT_SOFTREVAL`.
Fixes: c74dfe97c104 ("NFS: Add mount option 'softreval'")
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <dan.aloni@...tdata.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/nfs/fs_context.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
index 05b39e8f97b9..d60c086c6e9c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int nfs_fs_context_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc,
if (result.negated)
ctx->flags &= ~NFS_MOUNT_SOFTREVAL;
else
- ctx->flags &= NFS_MOUNT_SOFTREVAL;
+ ctx->flags |= NFS_MOUNT_SOFTREVAL;
break;
case Opt_posix:
if (result.negated)
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists