linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] x86/boot/tboot: Move tboot_force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220516155822.6130dd03@jacob-builder>
Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 15:58:22 -0700
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Ning Sun <ning.sun@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] x86/boot/tboot: Move tboot_force_iommu() to Intel
 IOMMU

Hi Jason,

On Mon, 16 May 2022 15:06:28 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:

> Unrelated, but when we are in the special secure IOMMU modes, do we
> force ATS off? Specifically does the IOMMU reject TLPs that are marked
> as translated?
Yes, VT-d context entry has a Device TLB Enable bit, if 0, it means
"Translation Requests (with or without PASID) and Translated Requests
received and processed through this scalable-mode context-entry are
blocked."

Thanks,

Jacob