linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 01/27] dyndbg: fix static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220516225640.3102269-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 16:56:14 -0600
From:   Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To:     jbaron@...mai.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
        seanpaul@...omium.org, robdclark@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, quic_saipraka@...cinc.com,
        will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        quic_psodagud@...cinc.com, maz@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        jim.cromie@...il.com, vincent.whitchurch@...s.com,
        Jason Baron <jbaaron@...mai.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/27] dyndbg: fix static_branch manipulation

In https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211209150910.GA23668@axis.com/

Vincent's patch commented on, and worked around, a bug toggling
static_branch's, when a 2nd PRINTK-ish flag was added.  The bug
results in a premature static_branch_disable when the 1st of 2 flags
was disabled.

The cited commit computed newflags, but then in the JUMP_LABEL block,
failed to use that result, instead using just one of the terms in it.
Using newflags instead made the code work properly.

This is Vincents test-case, reduced.  It needs the 2nd flag to
demonstrate the bug, but it's explanatory here.

pt_test() {
    echo 5 > /sys/module/dynamic_debug/verbose

    site="module tcp" # just one callsite
    echo " $site =_ " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control # clear it

    # A B ~A ~B
    for flg in +T +p "-T #broke here" -p; do
	echo " $site $flg " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
    done;

    # A B ~B ~A
    for flg in +T +p "-p #broke here" -T; do
	echo " $site $flg " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
    done
}
pt_test

Fixes: 84da83a6ffc0 dyndbg: combine flags & mask into a struct, simplify with it
CC: vincent.whitchurch@...s.com
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaaron@...mai.com>
---
.drop @stable, no exposed bug.
.add jbaron ack
---
 lib/dynamic_debug.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
index dd7f56af9aed..a56c1286ffa4 100644
--- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
+++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
@@ -211,10 +211,11 @@ static int ddebug_change(const struct ddebug_query *query,
 				continue;
 #ifdef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
 			if (dp->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT) {
-				if (!(modifiers->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT))
+				if (!(newflags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT))
 					static_branch_disable(&dp->key.dd_key_true);
-			} else if (modifiers->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)
+			} else if (newflags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT) {
 				static_branch_enable(&dp->key.dd_key_true);
+			}
 #endif
 			dp->flags = newflags;
 			v4pr_info("changed %s:%d [%s]%s =%s\n",
-- 
2.35.3