linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: add property to avoid device detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220516064338.GA28916@axis.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 08:43:38 +0200
From:   Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, <kernel@...s.com>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: add property to avoid device
 detection

On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 04:26:16PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> That aside, I am not sure we should handle this at DT level. Maybe we
> should better change the GPIO driver to not populate a class if we have
> a firmware node?

Is it always safe to not do this detection if we have a firmware node?
Then maybe the core could just always skip it in that case without
looking for a special property or requiring individual drivers to choose
what to do?