linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/52xx: Convert to use fwnode API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874k1p6oa7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 09:38:56 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/52xx: Convert to use fwnode API

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 05:05:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:48:05PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>> > > We may convert the GPT driver to use fwnode API for the sake
>> > > of consistency of the used APIs inside the driver.
>> > 
>> > I'm not sure about this one.
>> > 
>> > It's more consistent to use fwnode in this driver, but it's very
>> > inconsistent with the rest of the powerpc code. We have basically no
>> > uses of the fwnode APIs at the moment.
>> 
>> Fair point!
>> 
>> > It seems like a pretty straight-forward conversion, but there could
>> > easily be a bug in there, I don't have any way to test it. Do you?
>> 
>> Nope, only compile testing. The important part of this series is to
>> clean up of_node from GPIO library, so since here it's a user of
>> it I want to do that. This patch is just ad-hoc conversion that I
>> noticed is possible. But there is no any requirement to do so.
>> 
>> Lemme drop this from v3.
>
> I just realize that there is no point to send a v3. You can just apply
> first 3 patches. Or is your comment against entire series?

No, my comment is just about this patch.

I don't mind converting to new APIs when it's blocking some other
cleanup. But given the age of this code I think it's probably better to
just leave the rest of it as-is, unless someone volunteers to test it.

So yeah I'll just take patches 1-3 of this v2 series, no need to resend.

cheers