[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220516012121.GA56920@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 09:21:21 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>,
Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@...vell.com>,
"zengshun . wu" <zengshun.wu@...look.com>,
Al Grant <al.grant@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Tor Jeremiassen <tor@...com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] perf scripts python: Support Arm CoreSight trace
data disassembly
On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 02:18:53PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
[...]
> This looks good to me and will run on python 2. The code would be more
> idiomatic in python3 using f-strings. I'd rather the code was
> idiomatic from the beginning, but others may disagree and prefer
> python 2 compatibility (python 2 is now end of life). f-strings are
> python 3.6+ and so have been supported for 5 years.
Using f-string is the right thing for me, will update.
Thanks for reviewing and suggestion!
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists