[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875ym6kk7q.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 09:30:49 +0200
From: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] Input: mt6779-keypad - implement row/column
selection
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for your review,
On dim., mai 15, 2022 at 22:21, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
>> The MediaTek keypad has a total of 6 input rows and 6 input columns.
>> By default, rows/columns 0-2 are enabled.
>>
>> This is controlled by the KP_SEL register:
>> - bits[9:4] control row selection
>> - bits[15:10] control column selection
>>
>> Each bit enables the corresponding row/column number (e.g KP_SEL[4]
>> enables ROW0)
>>
>> Depending on how the keypad is wired, this may result in wrong readings
>> of the keypad state.
>>
>> Program the KP_SEL register to limit the key detection to n_rows,
>> n_cols we retrieve from the device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/keyboard/mt6779-keypad.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/mt6779-keypad.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/mt6779-keypad.c
>> index 23360de20da5..653dfc619696 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/mt6779-keypad.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/mt6779-keypad.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
>> #define MTK_KPD_DEBOUNCE 0x0018
>> #define MTK_KPD_DEBOUNCE_MASK GENMASK(13, 0)
>> #define MTK_KPD_DEBOUNCE_MAX_MS 256
>> +#define MTK_KPD_SEL 0x0020
>> +#define MTK_KPD_SEL_COL GENMASK(15, 10)
>> +#define MTK_KPD_SEL_ROW GENMASK(9, 4)
>> +#define MTK_KPD_SEL_COLMASK(c) (MTK_KPD_SEL_COL >> (6 - (c)))
>
> Would it be clearer to say
>
> #define MTK_KPD_SEL_COLMASK(c) GENMASK((c) + 3, 4)
Per my understanding, GENMASK is mostly used for build-time constants
since it does compile-time checks with BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO.
Since "c" is defined at run time (as it comes from keypad->n_cols, which
comes from the device tree), it felt more appropriate to not use GENMASK.
Looking again, i've found examples in sound/soc/codecs/cs35l41-lib.c
that use GENMASK with a run-time value.
Will send a v2 using GENMASK, thank you for the suggestion.
>
> ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists