[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CK10OTVFAP75.WCSVY40A7PXO@otso>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 09:45:20 +0200
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
<phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: convert to YAML
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon May 9, 2022 at 10:40 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/05/2022 10:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 03/01/2022 08:43, Luca Weiss wrote:
> >> Convert the PDC interrupt controller bindings to YAML.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >> ---
> >> Changes since v1:
> >> * Adjust description of second reg-name as suggested by Maulik Shah
> >>
> >> @Rob Herring: Hope it's ok to keep your R-b given the above changes
> >>
> >> This patch depends on the following patch, which fixed sm8250 & sm8350
> >> compatibles and adds sm6350.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211213082614.22651-4-luca.weiss@fairphone.com/
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Luca,
> > I think this needs resending as dependency was merged. Alternatively,
> > maybe Bjorn could pick it up through QCom SoC?
>
> Correction - it seems that Rob took the dependency in April, so this
> should go via Rob's tree as well.
>
> Luca, can you resend without Rob's Review tag and ask him to pick it up?
>
So... since torvalds/master my sm6350 patch is merged through Rob's
tree, but there was also a sm8150 patch applied through Linus Walleij's
tree. This means (as far as I understand) that neither can really
properly apply this (rebased) patch as one tree will have missed the
other commit.
Does it make sense to send a v3 rebased on linux-next now, or wait until
this has settled down in torvalds's tree?
Regards
Luca
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists