[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220516045821-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 05:03:35 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mie@...l.co.jp
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] virtio: last minute fixup
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:10:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 6:30 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > Links to other random places don't serve that function.
>
> What "function"?
>
> This is my argument. Those Link: things need to have a *reason*.
>
> Saying "they are a change ID" is not a reason. That's just a random
> word-salad. You need to have an active reason that you can explain,
> not just say "look, I want to add a message ID to every commit".
So I want to go to my inbox and compare the patch as received with what
is in my tree. What did I change? And I tweak both the patch content
when applying and the subject so these are not good indicators. Is this
at all convincing?
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists