[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220516101814.GA18490@wunner.de>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 12:18:14 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>, Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>,
Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] genirq: Provide generic_handle_domain_irq_safe().
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The problem with generic_handle_domain_irq() is that with `threadirqs'
> it will trigger "WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_hardirq())".
Now silenced by:
https://git.kernel.org/linus/792ea6a074ae
> +int generic_handle_domain_irq_safe(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int hwirq)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + ret = handle_irq_desc(irq_resolve_mapping(domain, hwirq));
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_handle_domain_irq_safe);
AFAICS you don't need to disable hardirqs at least for the "threadirqs"
case because irq_forced_thread_fn() already does that.
> drivers/bcma/driver_gpio.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c | 3 +--
> drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c | 6 ++++--
>From a quick look, the proper solution for all of those drivers is
probably to just add IRQF_NO_THREAD and be done with it.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists