linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 14/22] KVM: s390: mechanism to enable guest zPCI Interpretation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68a5e0c8-2dd9-a8a2-0333-fef95b2e2dfc@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 12:49:19 +0200
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
        imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, vneethv@...ux.ibm.com,
        oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net, jgg@...dia.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/22] KVM: s390: mechanism to enable guest zPCI
 Interpretation

On 13/05/2022 21.15, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> The guest must have access to certain facilities in order to allow
> interpretive execution of zPCI instructions and adapter event
> notifications.  However, there are some cases where a guest might
> disable interpretation -- provide a mechanism via which we can defer
> enabling the associated zPCI interpretation facilities until the guest
> indicates it wishes to use them.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  4 ++++
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h         | 10 +++++++++
>   3 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c1518a505060..8e381603b6a7 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -254,7 +254,10 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>   #define ECB2_IEP	0x20
>   #define ECB2_PFMFI	0x08
>   #define ECB2_ESCA	0x04
> +#define ECB2_ZPCI_LSI	0x02
>   	__u8    ecb2;                   /* 0x0062 */
> +#define ECB3_AISI	0x20
> +#define ECB3_AISII	0x10
>   #define ECB3_DEA 0x08
>   #define ECB3_AES 0x04
>   #define ECB3_RI  0x01
> @@ -940,6 +943,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
>   	int use_cmma;
>   	int use_pfmfi;
>   	int use_skf;
> +	int use_zpci_interp;
>   	int user_cpu_state_ctrl;
>   	int user_sigp;
>   	int user_stsi;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 5a0fbfd19c4a..0797661732cc 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -1031,6 +1031,42 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_set_crypto(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static void kvm_s390_vcpu_pci_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	/* Only set the ECB bits after guest requests zPCI interpretation */
> +	if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.use_zpci_interp)
> +		return;
> +
> +	vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb2 |= ECB2_ZPCI_LSI;
> +	vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_AISII + ECB3_AISI;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_s390_vcpu_pci_enable_interp(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	unsigned long i;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If host is configured for PCI and the necessary facilities are
> +	 * available, turn on interpretation for the life of this guest
> +	 */

I'd suggest to move the comment after the if-statement - it seems to fit 
better there.

> +	if (!kvm_s390_pci_interp_allowed())
> +		return;
> +
> +	kvm->arch.use_zpci_interp = 1;
> +
> +	kvm_s390_vcpu_block_all(kvm);
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		kvm_s390_vcpu_pci_setup(vcpu);
> +		kvm_s390_sync_request(KVM_REQ_VSIE_RESTART, vcpu);
> +	}
> +
> +	kvm_s390_vcpu_unblock_all(kvm);
> +}

  Thomas