| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220516022453.68420-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 10:24:53 +0800
From: Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, jolsa@...nel.org, davemarchevsky@...com,
joannekoong@...com, geliang.tang@...e.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, wangdongdong.6@...edance.com,
cong.wang@...edance.com, zhouchengming@...edance.com,
zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase
From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220511093854.411-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/T/
use /* */ instead of //
use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
use 8 bytes for value size
fix memory leak
use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
.../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
@@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
-#define TEST_VALUE 1
-
void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
{
struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
- int key = 0, ret;
- int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
- int *buf;
+ __u64 key = 0, sum;
+ int ret, i;
+ int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ __u64 *buf;
- buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
+ buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
return;
- memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
- buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
- skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
- return;
+ for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
+ buf[i] = i;
+ sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
+
+ skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
+ goto exit;
+
+ skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
+
+ ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
- ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
@@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
syscall(__NR_getuid);
- ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
- skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
- skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
- ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
+ test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array lookup percpu elem");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash lookup percpu elem");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");
+cleanup:
test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
+exit:
+ free(buf);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
index 5d4ef86cbf48..75479180571f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
@@ -1,52 +1,69 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
#include "vmlinux.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
-int percpu_array_elem_val = 0;
-int percpu_hash_elem_val = 0;
-int percpu_lru_hash_elem_val = 0;
+__u64 percpu_array_elem_sum = 0;
+__u64 percpu_hash_elem_sum = 0;
+__u64 percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum = 0;
+const volatile int nr_cpus;
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
__type(key, __u32);
- __type(value, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
} percpu_array_map SEC(".maps");
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
- __type(key, __u32);
- __type(value, __u32);
+ __type(key, __u64);
+ __type(value, __u64);
} percpu_hash_map SEC(".maps");
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
- __type(key, __u32);
- __type(value, __u32);
+ __type(key, __u64);
+ __type(value, __u64);
} percpu_lru_hash_map SEC(".maps");
+struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
+ void *map;
+ __u64 sum;
+};
+
+static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ __u64 key = 0;
+ __u64 *value;
+ value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
+ if (value)
+ ctx->sum += *value;
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getuid")
int sysenter_getuid(const void *ctx)
{
- __u32 key = 0;
- __u32 cpu = 0;
- __u32 *value;
+ struct read_percpu_elem_ctx map_ctx;
- value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_array_map, &key, cpu);
- if (value)
- percpu_array_elem_val = *value;
+ map_ctx.map = &percpu_array_map;
+ map_ctx.sum = 0;
+ bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+ percpu_array_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;
- value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_hash_map, &key, cpu);
- if (value)
- percpu_hash_elem_val = *value;
+ map_ctx.map = &percpu_hash_map;
+ map_ctx.sum = 0;
+ bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+ percpu_hash_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;
- value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_lru_hash_map, &key, cpu);
- if (value)
- percpu_lru_hash_elem_val = *value;
+ map_ctx.map = &percpu_lru_hash_map;
+ map_ctx.sum = 0;
+ bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+ percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;
return 0;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists