[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoI5NvHiihliSO/g@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 13:44:54 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
Cc: Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-hid: fix _DSM function index handling
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:23:22PM +0200, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> intel_hid_dsm_fn_mask is a bit mask containing one bit for each function
> index. Fix the function index check in intel_hid_evaluate_method
> accordingly, which was missed in commit 97ab4516205e ("platform/x86:
> intel-hid: fix _DSM function index handling").
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> index 13f8cf70b9ae..5c39d40a701b 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static bool intel_hid_evaluate_method(acpi_handle handle,
>
> method_name = (char *)intel_hid_dsm_fn_to_method[fn_index];
>
> - if (!(intel_hid_dsm_fn_mask & fn_index))
> + if (!(intel_hid_dsm_fn_mask & BIT(fn_index)))
> goto skip_dsm_eval;
>
> obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, &intel_dsm_guid,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists