linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 4/7] mm: hotplug: introduce SECTION_CANNOT_OPTIMIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 20:03:49 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc:     corbet@....net, mike.kravetz@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
        david@...hat.com, masahiroy@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        duanxiongchun@...edance.com, smuchun@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 4/7] mm: hotplug: introduce
 SECTION_CANNOT_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:38:46PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:22:08PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > @@ -913,6 +913,13 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
> >  	ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
> >  	set_section_nid(section_nr, nid);
> >  	__section_mark_present(ms, section_nr);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Mark whole section as non-optimizable once there is a subsection
> > +	 * whose vmemmap pages are allocated from alternative allocator. The
> > +	 * early section is always optimizable.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!early_section(ms) && altmap)
> > +		section_mark_cannot_optimize_vmemmap(ms);
> 
> Because no one expects those sections to be removed?
> IIRC, early_section + altmap only happened in case of sub-section pmem
> scenario?

Right. The commit ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
has more information.

> I guess my question is: can we really have early_sections coming
> from alternative allocator?
>

We can't. The early section does not consider partially being
populated currently.

> I think this should be spelled out more.

I think you mean add some comments here to describe the case
of early_section + altmap, right?

Thanks.