lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 18:30:24 +0200 From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, thuth@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, wintera@...ux.ibm.com, seiden@...ux.ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] s390x: KVM: ipte lock for SCA access should be contained in KVM On 5/12/22 11:08, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 06.05.22 11:24, Pierre Morel wrote: >> The former check to chose between SIIF or not SIIF can be done >> using the sclp.has_siif instead of accessing per vCPU structures >> >> When accessing the SCA, ipte lock and ipte_unlock do not need >> to access any vcpu structures but only the KVM structure. >> >> Let's simplify the ipte handling. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com> > > Much better > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> > > Thanks, Regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel IBM Lab Boeblingen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists